Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Avila v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Lizeth Avila
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv05161
Plaintiff:
Ivan Avila Perez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Avila v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00167
Plaintiff:
Lizeth Avila
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Avila-Cardenas v. Boe
as 2:2019cv01148
Respondent:
Jeri Boe
Petitioner:
Alberto Avila-Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
O'Rourke v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2019cv00302
Trustee:
Kevin, in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee for th O'Rourke
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., a Delaware corporation, Ashley Loyd, an individual, Ashley Loyd and others
Debtor:
Alma Briseida Avila
Plaintiff:
Kevin O'Rourke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Avila v. Key
as 2:2018cv00212
Respondent:
Robert Ferguson and James R Key
Petitioner:
Luis A Avila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
