Cases 1 - 10 of 63
A. Ezor v. Betty Yee, et al
as 23-55249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
A. EDWARD EZOR, DBA The Law Offices of A. Edward Ezor
Defendant / Appellee:
BETTY T. YEE, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, LEAH T. WILSON and others
Arthur Edward Ezor v. Betty T. Yee et al
as 2:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Arthur Edward Ezor
Defendant:
Betty T. Yee, State Bar of California, Leah T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
A. Edward Ezor v. Betty T. Yee et al
as 2:2022cv00840
Plaintiff:
A. Edward Ezor
Defendant:
Betty T. Yee, State Bar of California, Leah T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02491
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
United States of America v. Harbor Dist. Chapter, Natl Elec. Contractors Assn et al
as 2:2019mc00092
Defendant:
Harbor District Chapter, National Electrical Contractors Association, Craig Ritter, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00920
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv07748
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Vaughns et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2018cv05823
Plaintiff:
Albert Vaughns, L S, J C and others
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bridgestone Brands, LLC v. B. J. Seeley et al
as 5:2017cv01584
Plaintiff:
Bridgestone Brands, LLC
Defendant:
Forge Fitness, LLC and B. J. Seeley
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
