Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Yablonsky v. Alford et al
as 3:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
John Henry Yablonsky
Defendant:
Alford, Mondet, Steadman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
John Yablonsky v. CDCR, et al
as 22-56100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN HENRY YABLONSKY
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, Entity of the state of California, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, R.J. Donovan (CDCR), J. ROBLES, R.J. Donovan (CDCR) Librarian and others
Raul Arellano v. R. Blahnik
as 21-56249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
R. BLAHNIK
John Yablonsky v. CDCR, et al
as 21-55879
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN HENRY YABLONSKY
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, R.J. Donovan (CDCR), J. ROBLES, R.J. Donovan (CDCR) Librarian and others
Raul Arellano v. R. Blahnik
as 20-55421
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
R. BLAHNIK
Pamela Hill v. Manolo Blahnik USA, Ltd., et al
as 2:2018cv09367
Defendant:
Does 1-10, inclusive and Manolo Blahnik USA, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Blahnik et al
as 3:2018cv02262
Plaintiff:
Garland A. Jones
Defendant:
Previous Librarian, Prior Librarian and Mr. Blahnik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Raul Arellano v. R. Blahnik
as 18-56121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant - Appellee:
R. BLAHNIK
Yablonsky v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2018cv01122
Plaintiff:
John Henry Yablonsky
Defendant:
California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation, Daniel Paramo, J. Robles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruben Garcia, Jr. v. R. Blahnik, et al
as 17-55600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN DARIO GARCIA, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. BLAHNIK, R. ESTES, R. OLSEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
