Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rylee and Cru, Inc. v. Dopple, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Rylee and Cru, Inc.
Defendant:
Dopple, Inc. and Chao Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rylee and Cru, Inc. v. Dopple, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01519
Plaintiff:
RYLEE & CRU, INC.
Defendant:
DOPPLE, INC. and Chao Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. 12,110.37 In Bank Funds From US Bank Number Ending 0196 et al
as 5:2021cv02007
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
12,110.37 In Bank Funds From US Bank Number Ending 0196, 3,525.57 In Bank Funds From JPMorgan Chase Account Ending 5960 and 26,999.98 In Bank Funds From JPMorgan Chase Account Ending 0886
Claimant:
Chao Wang and Julia Chi Chin Wing
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
David Grigsby, et al v. BofI Holding, Inc., et al
as 19-55042
Plaintiff:
DAVID SIEBERT and BAR MANDALEVY
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY GARRABRANTS, BOFI HOLDING, INC., ESHEL BAR-ADON and others
Petitioner:
BOFI INVESTORS GROUP, CHAO WANG, PHILIP RICCIARDI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID GRIGSBY and JOSEPH SHEPARD, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chao Wang v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73116
Petitioner:
CHAO WANG
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Chao Wang v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-73160
Petitioner:
CHAO WANG
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
