Cases 1 - 10 of 792
(SS) Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
James Michael Carr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Carr v. Redwood Credit Union et al
as 3:2024cv02700
Plaintiff:
Deaudry Eugene Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Redwood Credit Union, Kim Odeh, Nguyen Fong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dr. Firpo Wycoff Carr, Phd v. Panera, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
Dr. Firpo Wycoff Carr, Phd
Defendant:
Panera, LLC Corporate, Dafe No. 1376 Cerritos, CA doing business as Panera Bread Cafe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oreginal M. Carr v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv03365
Plaintiff:
Oreginal M. Carr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Maehren et al v. City of Kirkland et al
as 2:2024cv00532
Petitioner:
Daniel and Angela Maehren, Ray and Susan Carr and Ariji Ganguly
Respondent:
City of Kirkland, 12708 NE 7th LLC, Adam Weinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jacqueline Carr v. Laboratory Corporation of America et al
as 2:2024cv03123
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Carr
Defendant:
Laboratory Corporation of America and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
N. C. v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Liseth Carr
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt v. Compton Cowboys, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02642
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant:
Compton Cowboys, Inc., Israel Houghton, Jekalyn Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
