Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Arnold v. County of San Diego Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01987
Petitioner: Chad Arnold
Respondent: County of San Diego Corporation, Kelly Martinez, Jeffrey Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold v. County of San Diego Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01396
Petitioner: Chad Arnold
Respondent: County of San Diego Corporation, San Diego County Board of Supervisors, Kelly Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold v. San Diego Department of Child Support Services et al
as 3:2022cv00317
Plaintiff: Chad Arnold
Defendant: San Diego Department of Child Support Services, Nick Macchione, Jeffrey Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Arnold v. Grissom et al
as 3:2021cv01720
Plaintiff: Chad Arnold
Defendant: Jeffrey Scott Grissom, San Diego Department of Child Support Services and Superior Court of California-County of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Chad Arnold v. Superior Court of California
as 20-72247
Petitioner: CHAD ARNOLD
Not Classified By Court: In re: CHAD ARNOLD and SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, o/b/o Jennifer Arnold
Respondent: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Hilde v. Roosevelt County et al
as 4:2013cv00062
Plaintiff: Chad Arnold Hilde
Defendant: Roosevelt County, City of Poplar, Montana Department of Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bentham v. Arnold
as 3:2013cv01424
Plaintiff: Craig Bentham
Defendant: Bingham Law Group, Chad Arnold, Quality Stocks, LLC and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Michael McCarthy, Ross Ewaniuk, Brent Jay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?