Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jamil Rasul Bey et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 2:2021cv08047
Plaintiff: Jamil Rasul Bey, Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey, Tariff Sharif Bey and others
Defendant: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts State Police-Medford, Ryan Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Ingrao v. Stoppelman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02753
Plaintiff: Nicholas R. Ingrao
Defendant: Charles "Lanny" Baker, Jeremy Stoppelman, Joseph R. "Jed" Nachman and others
USA v. Charles Baker, III
as 19-10407
Defendant / Appellant: CHARLES EDWARDSO BAKER III
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01183
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01008
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Baker
as 2:2017mj01611
Defendant: Charles Edwardson Baker (1)
Plaintiff: USA
Charles Edwardson Baker
as 2:2017mj01611
Defendant: Charles Edwardson Baker (1)
Plaintiff: USA
Baker v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 2:2016cv00729
Plaintiff: Charles Earl Baker
Defendant: Correction Corporation of America, Central Arizona Detention Center, Central Arizona Detention Center Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 4:2013cv02738
Petitioner: Charlie Baker and Charles Wesley Baker
Respondent: Wells Fargo & Company, Treasury Department and Shawn Kahler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Charles Baker, Jr. v. David Runnels, et al
as 10-17223
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES EDWARD BAKER, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: DAVID L. RUNNELS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?