Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hall v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv04897
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Charles Sylvester Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West Charleston Lofts I, LLC, et al v. R&O Construction Company, et al
as 09-16887
Plaintiff-third-party-defendant - Appellee:
WEST CHARLESTON LOFTS I, LLC and WCL COMMERCIAL, LLC
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
R&O CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES G. HALL, RICHARD D. BALCASTRO, KATE HAWKS and others
West Charleston Lofts I, LLC, et al v. R&O Construction Company, et al
as 09-16313
Plaintiff-third-party-defendant - Appellee:
WEST CHARLESTON LOFTS I, LLC and WCL COMMERCIAL, LLC
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
R&O CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES G. HALL, RICHARD D. BALCASTRO, KATE HAWKS and others
Dale Heineman, et al v. USDC-CAO
as 08-72400
:
In re: DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN and KURT F. JOHNSON
Petitioner:
DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN and KURT F. JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM H. ALSUP and CHARLES DAVID HALL
Heineman v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv02461
Petitioner:
Dale Scott Heineman
Respondent:
United States of America and Charles David Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv02462
Petitioner:
Kurt F. Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America, William H. Alsup and Charles David Hall
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Heineman v. United States of America et al
as 4:2008cv02461
Petitioner:
Dale Scott Heineman
Respondent:
United States of America, William H. Alsup and Charles David Hall
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
