Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Alfredo Ramirez et al v. AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Ramirez and Ramn Santos Castro
Defendant:
AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc., Charles E. Parks, III, John D. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Barrios v. AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02357
Plaintiff:
Wilis Barrios
Defendant:
AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc., Charles E. Parks III, John D. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 E.R.I.S.A.: Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Charles B. Parke v. Felicia Ponce
as 2:2021cv05926
Petitioner:
Charles B. Parke
Respondent:
Felicia Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Charles Parke v. USA
as 19-73075
Petitioner:
CHARLES BERNARD PARKE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Parks v. Muniz et al
as 5:2017cv06611
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Parks
Defendant:
W. L. Muniz, S. Zavala and J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Parke v. The State of Idaho, et al
as 12-35364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES PARKE PARKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO, CITY-COUNTY OF BOISE, IDAHO, IDAHO STATE PRISON, (BOISE, IDAHO) and others
Charles Parke v. USDC-MBU
as 12-70885
:
In re: CHARLES BERNARD PARKE
Petitioner:
CHARLES BERNARD PARKE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, BUTTE
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Charles Parke v. City of Butte, et al
as 11-35900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BERNARD PARKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BUTTE, SILVER BOW POLICE DEPT., JOHN WALSH, Sheriff and others
Parke v. USA
as 2:2011cv00058
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Bernard Parke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Charles Parke v. City of Butte, et al
as 11-35679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BERNARD PARKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BUTTE, SILVER BOW POLICE DEPT., JOHN WALSH, Sheriff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
