Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Choate v. Kings County Superior Court et al
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
George Graham Choate
Defendant:
Kings County Superior Court and Fandy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Choate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-1911
Petitioner:
STEPHEN LEE CHOATE
Respondent:
WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Choate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-1257
Petitioner:
STEPHEN LEE CHOATE
Respondent:
WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Choate v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada, et al.
as 23-2831
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN LEE CHOATE
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and WILLIAMS
Lopez Sanchez V. CDCR, et al.,
as 2:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Margarita Lopez Sanchez
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California State Prison, Sacramento, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv06012
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Stephen Choate v. Williams, et al
as 22-16494
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN LEE CHOATE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Stephen Choate v. USDC-NVL
as 22-70186
Not Classified By Court:
In re: STEPHEN LEE CHOATE, WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner:
STEPHEN LEE CHOATE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Clarke v. Choate et al
as 1:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Mark Choate and Jon Choate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
