Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Geppert v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv05763
Plaintiff: Rohno Geppert
Defendant: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Inc., a Utah corporation sole, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Inc. NKA The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Inc.; a Utah Corporation sole, Corporation of the President of the San Jose Stake of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, a California corporation sole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hiser v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00280
Defendant: Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors and Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Plaintiff: David Hiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe 1 et al v. Council et al
as 1:2020cv00497
Defendant: Grand Teton Council, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors and others
Plaintiff: Mark Doe 8, Mark Doe 1, Mark Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, et al.
as 3:2020cv00105
Plaintiff: Cynthia V Washington and Cynthia V. Washington
Defendant: Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Courtney Willden and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madalyn Jones v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, et al
as 8:2019cv00347
Defendant: Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Melanie Christensen, Does 2 through 50, inclusive and others
Plaintiff: Madalyn Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McDaniels v. Holmes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02414
Defendant: Eric Holmes, Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Plaintiff: Keenan McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
2151 Michelson, L.P. v. Corp of the Presiding Bishop We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-56106
Plaintiff - Appellant: 2151 MICHELSON, L.P., a California limited partnership
Defendant - Appellee: CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, a Utah Corporation
2151 Michelson, L.P. v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv00781
Plaintiff: 2151 Michelson, L.P.
Defendant: Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and DOES
Doe XX et al v. Boy Scouts of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00184
Plaintiff: John Doe XX , John Doe XXI , John Doe XXII and others
Defendant: Boy Scouts of America , Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Hoopes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02646
Defendant: Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Ethan Hoopes
Plaintiff: Nicolas Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?