Cases 1 - 10 of 4,596
Himmelberger v. Kiani et al
as 3:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Dianne Himmelberger
Defendant:
Joe Kiani, Micah Young, Bilal Muhsin and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Mario Abernathy v.Glenda Marti et al
as 5:2024cv01042
Defendant:
Wendy Y. Medina, Leon Carlo Sayo, Lisa Sayo and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Riviera et al v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
James Riviera, Curtis Banta, Yonkman Construction, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kjell Anderson, Jay Arnold, Todd Beyreuther and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
United States of America v. Morse
as 24-3057
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DERYL CRAIG MORSE
Williams Goyens-Bell Eberwein v. Denney et al
as 3:2024cv02881
Plaintiff:
Chaledeeannka Deborah Ann Williams Goyens-Bell Eberwein
Defendant:
Craig S Denney and N Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Craig v. Walmart, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00892
Plaintiff:
Greta Craig
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
(PC) Richard v. CHCF et al
as 2:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Craig Richard
Defendant:
CHCF, Richardson, Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolard v. The Glad Products Company et al
as 3:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Craig Woolard
Defendant:
The Glad Products Company and The Clorox Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
