Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Highley, et al., v. CA State University et al
as 2:2021at00583
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Janet Woodcock and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Myles Higley, Ryan D. Clark and Kyle J. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higley, et al., v. CA State University et al
as 2:2021cv01126
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Janet Woodcock and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Myles Higley, Ryan D. Clark and Kyle J. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Howell v. Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv00997
Defendant:
J. Davis, K. Johnson, A. Gough and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Markese D. Clark v. David Holbrook
as 2:2021cv04297
Petitioner:
Markese D. Clark
Respondent:
David Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Smith v. Diaz, et al.
as 1:2020cv00349
Defendant:
D. Clark, M. Lirones, E. Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Diaz et al
as 4:2020cv01557
Defendant:
D. Clark, M. Lirones, E. Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Bank N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Clark
as 3:2019cv01708
Defendant:
Alan D Clark
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Godinez v. Kernan et al
as 2:2018cv02921
Plaintiff:
Rafael Godinez
Defendant:
Filce, C. Lipton, D. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02838
Plaintiff:
Robert D Clark
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC , AT&T and - DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Glover et al
as 2:2016cv01886
Plaintiff:
Eric Frank Robinson
Defendant:
Glover, S. Henley, D. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
