Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dew v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01873
Plaintiff:
John Dew
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dew et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01698
Plaintiff:
James Dew and Carol Dew
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dews et al v. Coastal Transport Company Incorporated
as 4:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Claudia Dews and Michael Dews
Defendant:
Coastal Transport Company Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Dew
as 2:2016mc00081
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Ronald Dew
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Dews v. State of Arizona et al
as 2:2007cv01308
Petitioner:
Leon Dews
Respondent:
State of Arizona, State of California, Arizona Attorney General, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dews v. State of Arizona Superior Court, et al
as 2:2007cv01242
Petitioner:
Leon Dews
Respondent:
State of Arizona Superior Court and California Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dews v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2007cv01165
Plaintiff:
Leon Dews
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez v. Magnum et al
as 2:2007cv01131
Plaintiff:
Joey Anthony Valdez
Defendant:
J Kenneth Magnum, Smith C Shellie, Gerald R Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dews v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2007cv01003
Petitioner:
Leon Dews
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Kristin Sherman and Alyson Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dews v. CCG, LLC
as 4:2007cv00206
Plaintiff:
Claudia Dews
Defendant:
CCG, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
