Cases 1 - 10 of 752
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Josh Webber v. Damon Anthony Dash
as 2:2024cv03278
Plaintiff:
Josh Webber
Defendant:
Damon Anthony Dash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Boudjerada, et al. v. Medary, et al.
as 24-2419
Plaintiff:
HASHEEM BOUDJERADA, DAMON COCHRAN-SALINAS, ERIN GRADY and others
Defendant:
SARAH MEDARY, Chief CHRIS SKINNER, CITY OF EUGENE and others
Hammond et al v. Fieldly et al
as 2:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hammond and Dana Hepworth
Defendant:
John Fieldly, Nicholas Castaldo, Caroline Levy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crist v. Ada County et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Damon Victor Crist
Defendant:
Ada County, Ferguson, Raubenheimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glandros Danielle June, Jr. v. Rogelio Nunez et al
as 2:2024cv02658
Plaintiff:
Glandros Danielle June, Jr.
Defendant:
Rogelio Nunez, Stephanie Avila, Kimberly Jung and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reardon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Damon Reardon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hess v. Freedom Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2024at00327
Plaintiff:
Damon Hess
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage, Inc. and DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hess v. Freedom Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Damon Hess
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
