Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Villalobos Sorto v. Garland
as 22-102
Petitioner:
DANIEL SANTOS VILLALOBOS SORTO and IVAN ADALBERTO VILLALOBOS ZELAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
John Doe v. County of Sonoma, et al
as 20-15035
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA WALKER, COUNTY OF SONOMA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE and JOHN JONES DOE III
Agena v. Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00089
Plaintiff:
Patsy R. Ota, Cheryl Matsumoto, David K. Parages and others
Defendant:
Does 1 to 25, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. and Husch Blackwell LLP
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Danielle Santos Bernal v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02655
Defendant:
Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Antelope Valley Nissan, Inc., Volkswagen Group of America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Santos Bernal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Danielle Santos Bernal v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03154
Defendant:
Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Antelope Valley Nissan, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Santos Bernal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe v. Santos et al
as 3:2017cv06945
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Danielle Santos, County of Sonoma and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilchrist v. Joshua et al
as 3:2017cv00494
Plaintiff:
Morris B. Gilchrist
Defendant:
Alfred Joshua, Berkman, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2016cv05195
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, M.D. Lisa Walker, Steve Macdonald and others
Plaintiff:
Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
