Cases 1 - 10 of 1,402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Frazier v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05423
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ronald Frazier
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCre Incorporated, Michael Balderrama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kortright v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05413
Plaintiff:
Danielle C Kortright
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Amador v. Anderson
as 2:2024cv00737
Petitioner:
Daniel S Amador, II
Respondent:
Lisa Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Singleton et al v. Clark County et al
as 3:2024cv05392
Plaintiff:
Dalynne Singleton, JM, SM and others
Defendant:
Clark County, NaphCare Inc, Alyssa Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
