Cases 1 - 10 of 39,234
Rhone #245225 v. NaphCare Incorporated
as 2:2024cv01444
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Rhone
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Adobe, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv03630
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Adobe, Inc., Maninder Sawhney and David Wadhwani
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LEE v. YAN et al
as 3:2024cv03628
Plaintiff:
Martin Eng Lee
Defendant:
DEMAS YAN, CHEUK YAN, LEGAL RECOVERY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
L.S. v. MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity et al
as 2:2024cv05026
Plaintiff:
L.S.
Defendant:
MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity, MG Freesites, Ltd, a foreign entity, MindGeek USA Incorporated, a Delaware corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
