Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
De Anda v. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Abelardo De Anda
Defendant:
GEICO Advantage Insurance Company and GEICO Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Hugo De Anda v. Ford Motor Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04064
Plaintiff:
Hugo De Anda
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Inc. and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
(PC) Adams v. CDCR Officers et al
as 2:2021cv02087
Plaintiff:
Rineson Curtis Adams
Defendant:
CDCR Officers, De Anda, PREA Compliance Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. CDCR Officers et al
as 3:2021cv08051
Plaintiff:
Rineson Curtis Adams
Defendant:
CDCR Officers, De Anda, PREA Compliance Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(SS) De Anda v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01095
Plaintiff:
Lorene De Anda
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
De Anda v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021at00745
Plaintiff:
Lorene De Anda
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
