Cases 1 - 9 of 9
(PC) Smith v. Fresno County Jail
as 1:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Smith
Defendant:
Fresno County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Smith v. Zanoni
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Smith
Defendant:
John Zanoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company v. Beecroft et al
as 9:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company
Defendant:
Denice Yuill Beecroft, Dylan Ann Balulis, Elizabeth A. Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
(PC) Smith v. Zanoni
as 1:2023cv01003
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Smith
Defendant:
John Zanoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Smith v. Zanoni
as 1:2023cv00961
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Smith
Defendant:
John Zanoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Smith v. Mimms
as 1:2022cv01638
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Smith
Defendant:
Margret Mimms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bank of America, N.A. v. Bacara Ridge Association, et al
as 20-15806
Cross Defendant:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as the Trustee for the Benefit of the Certificate Holders of the CWHEQ Inc., Home Equity Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-S2 and DEREK L. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
BACARA RIDGE ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
ALESSI & KOENIG, LLC
Counter Claimant:
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC
Appellant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Miguel Rodriguez et al v. Choicepoint et al
as 2:2007cv06081
Plaintiff:
Miguel Rodriguez, Miguel Rodriguez, Miguel Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Choicepoint, Choicepoint Services, Inc, Choicepoint Online and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
