Cases 1 - 10 of 161,696
Doe v. Rasier-DC, LLC
as 3:2024cv06663
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Rasier-DC LLC doing business as Uber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chon v. Turkish Airlines, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv08218
Plaintiff:
Hye Suk Chon
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10, Inclusive and Turkish Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08209
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Chrome Hearts LLC v. Y.Y.G.M. SA d.b.a. BRANDY MELVILLE, et al
as 2:2024cv08221
Plaintiff:
Chrome Hearts LLC
Defendant:
Y.Y.G.M. SA d.b.a. BRANDY MELVILLE, and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Mni Inilaya v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Wanbli Hanska Mni Inilaya
Defendant:
John Does, N. Sharkey, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
