Cases 1 - 10 of 247
Sanford v. Elder
as 6:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Sean C Sanford
Defendant:
Kile C Elder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Mendez Zacarias v. Garland
as 24-3476
Petitioner:
ELDER RAUL MENDEZ ZACARIAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Elders et al v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Ann Elders and Rebecca Crampton
Defendant:
Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Jerry Alexander et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2024mc00008
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alexander, Marty Cohen, Charles Delle Donne and others
Defendant:
Dean Meiling, Madylon Meiling, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Jerry Alexander et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alexander, Marty Cohen, Charles Delle Donne and others
Defendant:
Dean Meiling, Madylon Meiling, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Nair, et al. v. Toth, et al.
as 23-3682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAYAKUMAR SUNDARAN NAIR, RAJAKUMARI SUSHEELKUMAR, JAYAKRISHNAN K NAIR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX TOTH, PAUL LEE, DJ VYZIS and others
Estrada De Leon v. Garland
as 23-642
Petitioner:
ELDER ALEXANDER ESTRADA DE LEON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Elder v. Social Security
as 2:2023cv01697
Plaintiff:
Ronita Elease Elder
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Rowe v. Judge Cristy Criag et al
as 2:2023cv01679
Plaintiff:
Michael Rowe
Defendant:
Judge Cristy Criag, Judge Natali Woods, Judge Jeannie Hua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
