Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mendenhall v. Griner et al
as 6:2023cv01255
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Aiden Mendenhall
Defendant:
Ms. Griner, Ms. Hartman, Ms. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griner v. JUUL Labs, Inc. previously d/b/a as PAX LABS, INC. and PLOOM INC et al
as 3:2022cv08013
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Griner
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Griner et al v. PNC Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv00371
Plaintiff:
Russell D. Griner and Joy Sims Griner
Defendant:
PNC Mortgage Company and Cal-Western Reconveyance LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Griner et al v. PNC Mortgage Company et al
as 2:2014cv00890
Plaintiff:
Joy Sims Griner and Russell David Griner
Defendant:
PNC Mortgage Company and Cal-Western Reconveyance LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hawthorne v. Griner et al
as 3:2013cv00464
Defendant:
Coach Albert and Griner
Plaintiff:
Adam Hawthorne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawthorne v. Griner et al
as 3:2013cv00225
Defendant:
Coach Albert and Griner
Plaintiff:
Adam Hawthorne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griner et al v. National City Mortgage et al
as 2:2012cv02822
Plaintiff:
Joy Sims Griner, Russell D. Griner and David Wynn Miller
Defendant:
National City Mortgage, National City Bank, MERS Corporation Incorporation and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Griner v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv00204
Plaintiff:
Philip S. Griner
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cintas Corporation v. Allen et al
as 3:2006cv05088
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Alice Allen , Gary Allspach , Rick Arango and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
