Cases 1 - 10 of 234
Garcia et al v. CR England Inc et al
as 3:2024cv05458
Plaintiff:
Maria Isabel Mojica Garcia and Cosme Antonio Garcia Lopez
Defendant:
C.R. England Inc. doing business as Premier Truck Driving School, England Carrier Services, West Valley Hosting, and ECS, Manuel Acosta, Corporations XYZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Garcia v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05049
Plaintiff:
Tamera Garcia
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carlson et al v. Adams County et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Chauna Carlson and Andrew Carlson
Defendant:
Adams County, Adams County Sheriffs Office, Adams County Sheriff Dale Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Garcia v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03035
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Garcia
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garcia v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03182
Plaintiff:
Juan Garcia
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
