Cases 1 - 10 of 838
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Gustavo Guzman v. The State of California
as 2:2024cv04268
Petitioner:
Gustavo Guzman
Respondent:
The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Credit One Bank, National Association
as 3:2024cv00837
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Reynaga Bonilla
Defendant:
Credit One Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nuno et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Nuno and Andrea G. Rubio Jimenez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Ngo v. Romero, et al.
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Chi Thanh Ngo
Defendant:
Manuel Romero, Rey Medeles, Gustavo Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vela v. Medeles, et al.
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guzman Vela
Defendant:
Rey Medeles, Gustavo Gutierrez and The City of Fresno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guzman Vela v. Medeles et al
as 1:2024at00335
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guzman Vela
Defendant:
Rey Medeles, Gustavo Gutierrez, Unknown Law Enforcement Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alvarez v. Newsome
as 4:2024cv02306
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Alvarez
Defendant:
Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michelle Bustamante v. County of Riverside et al
as 8:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bustamante
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Sheriff Chad Bianco, Sheriff Officer Gustavo Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
