Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Cozy Comfort Company LLC v. Star Marketing International Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv00187
Plaintiff: Cozy Comfort Company LLC
Defendant: Star Marketing International Incorporated doing business as Go Mushy doing business as Apollo USA, Dora Zhang, Unknown Zhang and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Vanessa Bryant, et al v. Island Express Helicopters, In, et al
as 22-55085
Plaintiff / Appellee: VANESSA BRYANT, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Kobe Bryant, Deceased and as Successor in Interest to GB, a minor, deceased, NATALIA BRYANT, individually as Surviving Child of Kobe Bryant, B. B., a minor, by her Natural Mother and Guardian Ad Litem, Vanessa Bryant and others
Intervenor: SPORTS ACADEMY, LLC SPORTS ACADEMY / THE HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INEMNITY COMPANY, Proposed: Plaintiff-in-Intervention
Defendant / Appellee: ISLAND EXPRESS HELICOPTERS, INC., a California corporation, ISLAND EXPRESS HOLDING CORPORATION, a California corporation, OC HELICOPTERS, LLC and others
3Rd Party Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Southland Cambodia Co., LTD. v. H and C Headwear Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01860
Plaintiff: SOUTHLAND (CAMBODIA) CO., LTD. and Southland Cambodia Co., LTD
Defendant: H & C HEADWEAR INC., SHUN ON NGAN, Does 1 through 20, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOUTHLAND (CAMBODIA) CO., LTD. v. H & C HEADWEAR INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01595
Plaintiff: SOUTHLAND (CAMBODIA) CO., LTD.
Defendant: H & C HEADWEAR INC. and SHUN ON NGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D.C. et al v. Molombo Thillot et al
as 2:2020cv11765
Defendant: NEW PRIME, INC., a Corporation, ALEX FARNSWORTH, MARTIN JANSS and others
Plaintiff: H.C, a minor, D.C., a minor, Winifred Robert White Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christopher L Chester et al v. County of Los Angeles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv10844
Petitioner: Sheriff Alex Villanueva, Riley Chester, Hayden Chester and others
Plaintiff: Christopher L Chester, H. C. and R. C.
Defendant: Los Angeles County Fire Department, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Chester et al v. Island Express Helicopters, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv08955
Defendant: Ara George Zobayan, OC Helicopters, LLC, Does 1-100, inclusive and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Island Express Holding Corp. and Island Express Helicopters, Inc.
Cross Defendant: United States of America, Matthew Conley, Kyle Larsen and others
Plaintiff: Christopher Chester, H. C. and R. C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Pac. Coast Plumb. Supply Assn et al
as 2:2019mc00084
Defendant: F. A. Nitchey, A. H. Busch Co., A. R. Gardner and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Richard Abuka, et al v. The City of El Cajon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-55335
Plaintiff: H. C., a minor, individually and as Successor in Interest to Alfred Okwera Olango, deceased, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Celanese Small, TAINA ROZIER, individually and as successor in interest to Alfred Okwera Olango, deceased and C. O., a minor, individually and as Successor in Interest to Alfred Okwera Olango, deceased, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Taina Rozier
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD OLANGO ABUKA, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: RICHARD GONSALVES and THE CITY OF EL CAJON, a municipal entity
M.H.C. v. County of Los Angeles, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv08305
Petitioner: Terri McDonald, M.H. C., Anna Cano and others
Defendant: County of Los Angeles, Does 1 through 20, inclusive and Probation Chief Terri McDonald
Plaintiff: M. H. C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?