Cases 1 - 10 of 898
Harper v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv03340
Plaintiff:
Alan Harper
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and The Air Liquide USA LLC Group Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Harper v. Georges, et al.
as 24-3514
Plaintiff:
PATRICK ROY HARPER
Defendant:
PETER GEORGES, individually and in his official capacity as California Department of Fish and Wildlife, LORI FRUGOLI, individually and in her official capacity as District Attorney County of Marin, MICHAEL WEAR, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy District Attorney County of Marin and others
Daniel James Harper v. F. Flores et al
as 2:2024cv04623
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
F. Flores and CSP Lancaster Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel James Harper v. C. Chetman
as 2:2024cv04622
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
C. Chetman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gwendolyn Hall v. Alicia G. Rosenberg et al
as 2:2024cv04396
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, Federal Judge Otis Wright, KTLA-TV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gastelum v. Butte County, et al.,
as 2:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
Cesar Gastelum
Defendant:
Butte County, Tristan Harper and Patrick McNelis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Daniel Harper v. C. Chatman
as 2:2024cv03902
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
C Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
