Cases 1 - 10 of 786
Abboud et al v. Autism Learning Partners, LLC
as 5:2024cv02518
Plaintiff:
Crystal Roberson, Mohamad Abboud, Avinash Somir and others
Defendant:
Autism Learning Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brown v. Morgan et al
as 4:2024cv05146
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyree Brown
Defendant:
Donald Holbrook, Cus Addamire, Ron Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes North America, Inc. et al v. eManualOnline.com
as 2:2024cv09359
Defendant:
eManualOnline.com
Plaintiff:
Haynes Group Limited and Haynes North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Kane v. Strange et al
as 4:2024cv05130
Defendant:
William Stockwell, Cheryl Strange, Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Kane and Abdoulaye Toumbou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis, et al. v. Walker, et al.
as 24-6508
Plaintiff:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS, guardian ad litem Tiffany Starcevich, RONNIE TOLLIVER, Guardian Ad Litem for Kennard Lee Davis and JENNIFER BROWN, Guardian Ad Litem for Kennard Lee Davis
Defendant:
NANCY DUNNE, CHERYL BAKEWELL, ROBERT ALLEN HAYNES and others
(PC)Haynes v. Delacruz
as 1:2024cv01121
Defendant:
Delacruz
Plaintiff:
Rayshawn Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Avila et al v. NewRez LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02264
Defendant:
NewRez LLC Doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, JP Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corporation and Peak Foreclosure Services INC.
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Avila and John Hayne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nettrour v. Lekeanjia, et al.
as 24-5030
Defendant:
MIKE BORUP, Health Services Administrator at Mohave County Detention Center, COUNTY OF MOHAVE, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCE INCORPORATED, Contracted Provider/ Health Needs at Mohave County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN CHRISTOPHER NETTROUR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
