Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Haynes v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
Patricia Haynes
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Becton Dickinson and Company, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haynes v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Robert Haynes
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brumfield v. Unknown Parties
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Quaraii Rashad Brumfield
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Crystal Ann Jones, Charity Bedwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Karina Elizabeth Haynes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Haynes v. Adel et al
as 2:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Darryl Antonio Haynes
Defendant:
Allister Adel, Steve McCarthy, Gregory R Bizzozero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Adel
as 2:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Darryl Antonio Haynes
Defendant:
Allister Adel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haynes v. Penzone
as 2:2021cv02129
Petitioner:
Darryl Antonio Haynes
Respondent:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haynes v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2021cv01879
Plaintiff:
Darryl Antonio Haynes
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv01449
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Robinson
Defendant:
Shanda Payne, Dave Young, Shaun Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Punchall v. US Subsidiary Incorporated District of New Mexico et al
as 4:2020cv00350
Plaintiff:
Lord Punchall and Billy Edwards
Defendant:
Danial Veramontez, Roman Colter, Unknown Eby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
