Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jeffrey Mills, et al v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 23-15945
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEFFREY MILLS, GEORGE E. COLES, OLLIE L. BRYANT, Jr. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, JOSEPH BICK, DEAN BORDERS, Warden and others
In re: Alex Ulep, et al v. State of California, et al
as 23-15806
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO DELGADILLO LOPEZ, ALEX LOPEZ, ALEX ULEP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Mills v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2022cv05126
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Mills
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re CIM-SQ Transfer Cases
as 3:2022mc80066
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter, Sr., Robert Lee Cole, Lovell Colvin and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ron Broomfield, State of California and others
Jeffrey Mills v. K. Mitchell, et al
as 18-15531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. MITCHELL, J. VAN BLARCOM, E. EVANS and others
Mills v. Salmonson
as 1:2018cv00034
Respondent:
James Salmonson
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton et al v. Salmonson
as 6:2018cv00030
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Hamilton, Jeffrey Mills, David Azure and others
Respondent:
James Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mills v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2016cv05095
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Mills
Defendant:
K. Mitchell , J. Van Blarcom , E. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Lancaster, et al v. James Tilton, et al
as 08-15585
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW LANCASTER, JEFFREY MILLS, DEXTER WILLIAMS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES E. TILTON and ROBERT L. AYERS, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
