Cases 1 - 7 of 7
John Shaw v. Timothy Lindgren et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv02700
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Timothy Lindgren and John Doe
Plaintiff:
John Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Simpson et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2015cv04906
Plaintiff:
John Shaw
Defendant:
Simpson, Alexandria Gardner and Sepulveda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Sepulveda et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2014cv01246
Plaintiff:
John Shaw
Defendant:
David Sepulveda, Orry P Korb and Aryn Paige Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Chang et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2013cv02532
Plaintiff:
John Shaw
Defendant:
Chang and Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Diaz
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2013cv01739
Petitioner:
John Shaw
Respondent:
Ralph M. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ePropertySites LLC v. 1-PROP.COM LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2010cv01088
Defendant:
1-PROP.COM LLC, DOES and John Shaw
Plaintiff:
ePropertySites LLC
Shaw v. State of California et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2009cv00077
Petitioner:
John Shaw
Respondent:
State of California and Flores
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.