Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv01463
Plaintiff:
Alaskan Anvil LLC
Defendant:
Patrick Davis and Jane Doe Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Alaskan Anvil, LLC v. Davis et al
as 3:2016cv05796
Plaintiff:
Alaskan Anvil LLC
Defendant:
Patrick Davis and Jane Doe Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullivan v. City of Marysville et al
as 2:2013cv00803
Defendant:
City of Marysville , Christopher Jones , Billy Xiong and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peter Palmer v. County of Yavapai, et al
as 10-17690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER MICHAEL PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF YAVAPAI, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, MARY E. HAMM, SHEILA POLK and others
Crepea v. Granite Construction Company et al
as 4:2009cv00396
Defendant:
Granite Construction Company, Chad Housler, Jane Doe Housler and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Crepea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Okken, et al v. Davis, et al
as 2:2008cv01387
Plaintiff:
Tyler D. Okken and Duane E. Okken
Defendant:
Jimmie Carol Davis, Jane Doe Davis, U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Daniels v. Davis et al
as 4:2007cv00559
Plaintiff:
Ruth Daniels
Defendant:
Thomas P Davis, Jane Doe Davis, Department of Pharmacology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ring et al v. Reichert et al
as 2:2007cv00693
Plaintiff:
George Daniel Ring, Jr and Rebecca Rose
Defendant:
Dave Reichert, Julie Reichert, Sue Rahr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
