Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thomas v. JC Penney Corporation Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Thomas
Defendant:
JC Penney Corporation Inc , North Town Mall LLC , KONE Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Allah v. Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv05061
Plaintiff:
Allah
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections, Bernard Warner, Donald R Holbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clive Melville et al v. Robert Adams et al
as 2:2015cv08188
Defendant:
Robert Adams, Jordon Davies, MD Mark Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Clive Melville and Vex (WA) Pty Ltd.
Martin v. Gulick, M.D., et al
as 2:2014cv00525
Defendant:
9 Jane or John Doe's at (OSP), (TRCI) and (SRCI), Dental, Therapeutic Level of Care Committee (TLC), Linda Gruenwald and others
SRCI:
Bennett, Bristol, M.D., Sgt. H. Brown and others
TRCI:
Sergeant Clayton, Hendry, Hillmick and others
OSP:
Kerry Coffey, Jason Hanson and Townes
Oregon State Penitentiary OSP:
Contreras
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Peters et al
as 2:2014cv00132
Defendant:
Cpl. Akers, B. Anana, Archer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael David Benson Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Oregon Department of Corretions et al
as 2:2011cv01329
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Jane Doe's, Correctional Officer John Doe's, Mark Nooth and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Earl Harvey Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamil Halise Chaka et al v. Lee Baca et al
as 2:2010cv02503
Defendant:
Lee Baca, Lee Baca, John Doe's One Thru Five and others
Plaintiff:
Jamil Halise Chaka
Eric Griffin v. Metropolitan Detention Center et al
as 2:2010cv01658
Respondent:
Dept of Justice, Jane Doe's, John Doe's and others
Petitioner:
Eric Griffin
John Keller v. John Doe's 1-5 et al
as 2:2010cv01201
Defendant:
John Doe's 1-5, N.K.S.P., N.K.S.P. and others
Plaintiff:
John Keller
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
