Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Ramirez Reyes v. Garland
as 24-1573
Petitioner:
JOSE ROLANDO RAMIREZ REYES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez Lopez v. Garland
as 24-1294
Petitioner:
JOSE GUILLERMO RAMIREZ LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Villagran Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4275
Petitioner:
RAMIRO JOSE VILLAGRAN LOPEZ, ELIDA ISABEL LIMA RAMIREZ, ANDY JOSE LIMA RAMIREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Paul Sapan v. JG Builders, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02124
Plaintiff:
Paul Sapan
Defendant:
JG Builders, Inc. dba Ecosmart Builders and Jose G. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ramirez v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01330
Petitioner:
Guillermo Jose Leon Ramirez
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
The Two Hundred for Homeownership, et al. v. California Air Resources Board, et al.
as 1:2022cv01474
Plaintiff:
The Two Hundred for Homeownership, Robert Apodaca and Jose Antonio Ramirez
Defendant:
California Air Resources Board and Steven S. Cliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The Two Hundred for Homeownership et al v. California Air Resources Board et al
as 1:2022at00904
Petitioner:
The Two Hundred for Homeownership, Robert Apodaca and Jose Antonio Ramirez
Respondent:
California Air Resources Board and Steven Cliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
