Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gerow v. DOJ - United States Department of Justice, et al.
as 26-4673
Defendant:
KEITH RICHERSON, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Jane or John Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC GEROW
Thieriot v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.
as 26-4147
Plaintiff:
ELISABETH I. THIERIOT
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., KATE BIDDLE, Vice President of Records, SALWA KAMAL and others
Shakespeare et al v. Anthropic PBC et al
as 4:2026cv05931
Plaintiff:
Thomas William Shakespeare, Nolan Bushnell, Charles Glass and others
Defendant:
Anthropic PBC, Dario Amodei and Benjamin Mann
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Coyle v. Brown, et al.
as 26-3915
Defendant:
COLETTE S. PETERS, KATE BROWN, C. Peters and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HENRY COYLE
Shakespeare et al v. Carney et al
as 3:2026cv05598
Plaintiff:
Thomas William Shakespeare, Nolan Bushnell, Laura Esquivel and others
Defendant:
Anthropic PBC, Dario Amodei and Benjamin Mann
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv08113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kates v. Sheridan
as 2:2026cv03534
Plaintiff:
Destyne Kates
Defendant:
Gerard A Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Melunsky et al v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 5:2026cv03460
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Melunsky, Dana Cutolo, Kate Shimshock and others
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Melunsky et al v. Gupta et al
as 5:2026cv03457
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Melunsky, Dana Cutolo, Kate Shimshock and others
Defendant:
Shubhranshu Gupta and LinkedIn Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
