Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Flaxman et al v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Abraham Flaxman and Amy Hagopian
Defendant:
Bob Ferguson and Kate Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barber et al v. Compass Health
as 2:2022cv01289
Plaintiff:
Lauren Barber, Kate Hume and Catherine Baum
Defendant:
Compass Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Young v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv05361
Plaintiff:
Matthew Young
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Department of Corrections, Multnomah County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv05838
Plaintiff:
Kate Shaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Didzun v. The Home Depot Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01540
Plaintiff:
Richard James Didzun, Ian McAndrews and Kate McAndrews
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Home Depot USA, Inc., The Home Depot Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Powell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv05401
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kate Lorrena Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
D'Amico et al v. Jefferson County et al
as 3:2020cv05253
Plaintiff:
D'Amico, Fort Discovery Corp and Joseph D'Amico
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Kathleen Kler, David Stanko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy v. Dope Magazine II, LLC
as 2:2018cv00911
Plaintiff:
Kate Roy
Defendant:
Dope Magazine II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Foddrill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv03068
Plaintiff:
Kate Foddrill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
