Cases 1 - 10 of 2,563
Mac Project LLC v. High Lonesome Claims et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Mac Project LLC
Defendant:
High Lonesome Claims, High Lonesome Mining, Inc, Richard W. Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mac Project LLC v. High Lonesome Claims et al
as 2:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Mac Project LLC
Defendant:
High Lonesome Claims, High Lonesome Mining, Inc, Richard W. Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Leslie Petersil v. General Motors LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04125
Plaintiff:
Leslie Petersil
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Lesly Chavez v. Telli Griffin et al
as 5:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
LESLY CHAVEZ dba SEALS ON WHEELS NOTARY
Defendant:
TELLI GRIFFIN and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Chavez v. Griffin al
as 2:2024at00607
Plaintiff:
Lesly Chavez
Defendant:
Telli Griffin and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Molina Rojas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3010
Petitioner:
MAYRA MOLINA ROJAS and LESLIE PAHUAMBA MOLINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Smith v. State of California
as 5:2024cv02761
Plaintiff:
Leslie Rosalee Smith
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ochoa Trochez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2886
Petitioner:
LESLY MARIELA OCHOA TROCHEZ and I. J. B.O.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez Arostegui, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2787
Petitioner:
LESTER PASCUAL LOPEZ AROSTEGUI, ALBA NUBIA RIOS PEREZ and LESLY DARIANA LOPEZ RIOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
P.C. et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2024cv02597
Plaintiff:
P.C. and M.C.
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Estate of Jacqueline Johnson, Monisha Sashital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
