Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Blackburn et al v. Growlife, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01855
Defendant:
Growlife, Inc., Mark Scott and Marco Hegyi
Plaintiff:
Brad Mickelsen and William Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blackburn et al v. Growlife, Inc. et al
as 2:2020at00903
Defendant:
Growlife, Inc., Mark Scott and Marco Hegyi
Plaintiff:
Brad Mickelsen and William Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lomando Scott v. USA
as 20-71702
Petitioner:
LOMANDO MARK SCOTT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pepe's, Inc. v. Virginia Marquez, et al
as 19-56501
Defendant / Appellant:
JOLENA GRIDER, JOHN VALDIVIA, R. CAREY DAVIS and others
Defendant:
DOES, 1-10 and CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PEPE'S, INC., a California corporation, DBA Pepe's Towing
Petitioner:
GREGG KETTLES
Scott et al v. Petaluma Animal Services Foundation et al
as 3:2018cv07829
Defendant:
Petaluma Animal Services Foundation and Jeff Charter
Plaintiff:
Misty Guy, Kathy Sousa and Mark Scott
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Pepe s Inc. v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2018cv02277
Defendant:
Bessine L. Richard, Mark Scott, James L. Mulvihill and others
Plaintiff:
Pepe's Inc. dba Pepe's Towing, PePe s, Inc. and PePe s, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Pepe s Towing
Petitioner:
Attorney Gregg W. Kettles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02139
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Mark Scott Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Scott Thornton v. Ronald Davis
as 2:2018cv01184
Respondent:
Ronald Davis
Petitioner:
Mark Scott Thornton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01623
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
