Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Paulo v. Williams, et al.
as 24-1083
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN PAULO
Defendant:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, JULIE MATOUSEK, MONIQUE HUBBARD-PICKETT and others
Stephani Matousek v. Noom, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01639
Plaintiff:
Stephani Matousek
Defendant:
Noom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Espinosa v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Espinosa
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Warden William Gittere, Williams (Matousek) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon et al v. Salkoff et al
as 2:2022cv01197
Plaintiff:
S. Seanah Dixon and Toney A. White
Defendant:
S Salkoff, Terrence Jackson, Ernesto Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Picozzi v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv01011
Defendant:
Julie Matousek, Danyele Sipes, State of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Picozzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Aranas et al
as 2:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Inginio Hernandez
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Dr. Michael Koehn, Gloria Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz-Castro v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Christopher Diaz-Castro
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arthur Garrison v. A. Gregerson, et al
as 21-16871
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE GARRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. GREGERSON, D. NEVEN, ROMEO ARANAS and others
Farvela v. Matousek et al
as 2:2021cv01720
Plaintiff:
Saul Farvela
Defendant:
Matousek, Perkins, Lima and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green Stream Holdings, Inc. v. Khan et al
as 2:2020cv01328
Defendant:
Ken Williams, Connie Helwig, 375 Wall Construction, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Green Stream Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
