Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Musgrove v. Ross
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Theodore E Musgrove
Defendant:
Scott Brow, Chuck Windor, Patrick McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Duwell, et al.
as 24-5827
Respondent:
TERRY KIRKHAM, SHELLY PARKER, MICHAEL ROSS and others
Petitioner:
DEVON JOSEPH ANDERSON
Custodio v. Dowell et al
as 1:2021cv00351
Plaintiff:
Elias Manuel Custodio
Defendant:
Ashley Dowell, Sandy Jones, Lisa Bostaph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Custodio v. Dowell et al
as 1:2021cv00337
Plaintiff:
Elias Manuel Custodio
Defendant:
Ashley Dowell, Sandy Jones, Lisa Bostaph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Craven et al
as 1:2020cv00037
Plaintiff:
Terrence James Matthews
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Norman Langelak, Cris Colson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Halbert v. Jones et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Rich Wills, Ricky D Forbus, Sandy Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Halbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mike Matthews et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv07773
Plaintiff:
Erin Holland and Mike Matthews
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Future Ford of Clovis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Matthews et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01537
Plaintiff:
Erin Holland and Mike Matthews
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Future Ford of Clovis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Matthews et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018at00951
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Future Ford of Clovis
Plaintiff:
Mike Matthews and Erin Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Drennen et al v. Hood River County et al
as 3:2014cv01770
Plaintiff:
Carol Lynn Drennen and Palate Pleaser, Inc.
Defendant:
Johnson Dunn, Hood River County, Mike Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
