Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al.
as 24-106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, "OBSERVER", "Q" and others
Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al.
as 23-3569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, LINDSEY, SHIFT COMMAND and others
(SS) McCarter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Nancy McCarter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
McCarter v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Timothy McCarter
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Robyn Rosenfield, Dr. Leland Beamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uniqui Bradley v. Racquel McCarter, et al
as 23-15417
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNIQUI BRADLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
RACQUEL L. MCCARTER and STATE OF NEVADA
Maria Magliocchini et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04991
Plaintiff:
Steven Sharamitaro, Maria Magliocchini, Christie Magnus and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mendy v. Tapia et al
as 2:2022cv00937
Plaintiff:
Edward Bissau Mendy
Defendant:
Luis A. Tapia, Does 1 through 10 and Layla McCarter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
McCarter v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Roy Rusch McCarter
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron D. Ford, District Attorney Steven B. Wolfson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) McCarter v. People of California
as 2:2022cv00462
Petitioner:
Steven McCarter
Respondent:
People of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCarter v. People of California
as 4:2022cv01111
Petitioner:
Steven A. McCarter
Respondent:
People of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
