Cases 1 - 10 of 499
Zachary McKinney v. Munchkin, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04338
Plaintiff:
Zachary McKinney
Defendant:
Munchkin, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bridge WF CA Crystal View LP v. Delaney Ahern et al
as 8:2024cv01114
Plaintiff:
Bridge WF CA Crystal View LP
Defendant:
Delany Ahern and Louie Mckinney
Angelone et al v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Kurt J Angelone, John Griffin Headrick, Adam Persell and others
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Ronald Haynes, AHCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ploof v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
Jon Ploof
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., David McKinney and Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McKinney v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph McKinney
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bridge WF CA Crystal View LP v. Ahern et al
as 8:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Bridge WF CA Crystal View LP
Defendant:
Delany Ahern and Louie Mckinney
Alonzo McKinney v. Rocha
as 2:2024cv02295
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKinney
Respondent:
Rocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) McKiney v. Newson
as 2:2024cv00680
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKiney, Alonzo McKinney and Alonso McKiney
Respondent:
Newson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darrel R Fisher v. Gerald McKinney et al
as 2:2024cv03284
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
Gerald McKinney and Larry DiCieno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
Anthony McKinney
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Dr. Avrom, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
