Cases 1 - 10 of 231
Vincent v. Mims
as 3:2024cv01340
Petitioner:
Richard A. Vincent
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(SS)(PS) Mims v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01515
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kim Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MIMS v. O'Malley
as 1:2024at00424
Plaintiff:
KIM MIMS
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mims et al v. Kalakau et al
as 2:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Delron Mims, Shareef Brown, Delron D. Mims and others
Defendant:
Shentel Kalakau and DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mims et al v. Kalakau et al
as 2:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Delron Mims and Shareef Brown
Defendant:
Shentel Kalakau and DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PC) Roark v. Dyer et al
as 2:2023cv02479
Plaintiff:
Jared W. Roark
Defendant:
Jerry Dyer, Margaret Mims, Manny Sandavol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Roark v. Dyer et al
as 1:2023cv01550
Plaintiff:
Jared W. Roark
Defendant:
Jerry Dyer, Margaret Mims, Manny Sandavol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillip Sanders v. Margaret Mims, et al
as 23-16088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP EUGENE SANDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARGARET MIMS, Fresno County Sheriff and VANG, Correctional Officer at Fresno County Jail
Copeland et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02087
Plaintiff:
Don Copeland, Joseph Murray, Carol Smith and others
Defendant:
Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Wal-Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
James Manalisay v. Boydine Hall, et al
as 23-15476
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MANALISAY
Defendant / Appellee:
BOYDINE HALL, ADAM BYER, TONI MIMS-COCHRAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
