Cases 1 - 10 of 18
USA v. Robert Beal
as 22-10034
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT DARNELL BEAL, AKA Oso
World Axe Throwing League, Inc et al v. Transform SR Brands LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
World Axe Throwing League, Inc and Lincoln Chicago Holdings, Inc
Defendant:
Transform SR Brands LLC, Oso Grande Knife & Tool Company, Reliks Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
In The Matter of The Complaint of Sub Sea Tours, LLC
as 2:2021cv09580
Petitioner:
SUB SEA TOURS, LLC, as Owner of the DOS OSOS and Sub Sea Tours, LLC
USA v. William Wooten
as 21-50126
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM WOOTEN, AKA Nutty Beeda Bickest, AKA Oso Gother Laced
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Eduardo Hernandez
as 18-50181
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDUARDO HERNANDEZ, AKA Ed Garcia, AKA Eduardo Garcia, AKA Eduardo Hernadez, AKA Eduardo Perez Hernandez, AKA Edward Hernandez, AKA Lil Oso, AKA Jorge Mateo Martinez, AKA Oso, AKA Hernandez Oso, AKA Edward Perez, AKA Terco
USA v. Jose Garcia
as 17-50068
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS GARCIA, AKA Oso, AKA Texaco
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04807
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv09435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mittasch et al v. City of Fremont et al
as 3:2012cv04333
Plaintiff:
Robin Mittasch , A Passion for Paws Akita Rescue Inc. and El Rel Junior/Oso
Defendant:
City of Fremont , Tri-City Animal Shelter and Howard Russel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
