Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Stephens v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Shawn Leroy Stephens
Defendant:
USA President Mr. Joseph Biden, USA President Obama, USA President Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fabian Barajas v. Google Adsense et al
as 2:2021cv04119
Defendant:
Mr. President Obama, Pluto T.V., Google Adsense and others
Plaintiff:
Fabian Barajas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Fabian Barajas v. Google Adsense et al
as 2:2021cv02979
Defendant:
Mr. President Obama, Google Adsense, Fidelity Creditor Serv. and others
Plaintiff:
Fabian Barajas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Stevanus Edward v. Obama et al
as 8:2018cv00737
Defendant:
Arrowhead Hospital, Attorney Telleria and Levy, Judge Jesus Bernal and others
Plaintiff:
Stevanus Edward
Stevanus Edward v. Former President Obama et al
as 8:2017cv00792
Defendant:
Arrowhead Hospital CA, Attorney Telleria and Levy CA, Baptist Hospital CA and others
Plaintiff:
Stevanus Edward
Movant:
Northwest Imaging Nebraska
Stevanus Edward v. President Obama et al
as 8:2016cv01677
Defendant:
Arrowhead Hospital, Attorney General California, Baptist Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Stevanus Edward
Stevanus Edward v. President Obama, D.C et al
as 5:2016cv01312
Defendant:
Arrowhead Hospital, Ca, Attorney Telleria and Levy, CA, Baptist Hospital, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Stevanus Edward
Baker v. President Obama
as 3:2014cv05521
Plaintiff:
Randy Baker
Defendant:
President Obama
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Reitz v. Federal Gov et al
as 3:2014cv00397
Defendant:
Both Houses of Congress, Federal Gov, Judge and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Mark Reitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sager v. U.S. Government
as 2:2013cv00369
Defendant:
James Albanese, Victor J. Albanese, Area 51 and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret E. Sager, II
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
