Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Quincetta Cargill v. USA, et al
as 23-35185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINCETTA Y. CARGILL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSEPH R BIDEN, President of the United States of America, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States of America and others
Nicholas Stone v. T. Robinson, et al
as 22-16587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS SCOTT STONE
Defendant / Appellee:
T. ROBINSON, Y. YANG, LVN, R. DAVID and others
Cargill v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00949
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Y Cargill
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph R Biden, Jr, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Lawson et al
as 3:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
M.D. Joe Dean Crawford
Defendant:
Kristina D. Lawson, Randy W. Hawkins, Laurie Rose Lubiano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Custodio v. Dowell et al
as 1:2021cv00351
Plaintiff:
Elias Manuel Custodio
Defendant:
Ashley Dowell, Sandy Jones, Lisa Bostaph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Custodio v. Dowell et al
as 1:2021cv00337
Plaintiff:
Elias Manuel Custodio
Defendant:
Ashley Dowell, Sandy Jones, Lisa Bostaph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Stone v. Robinson, et al.
as 1:2019cv00703
Defendant:
T. Robinson, BPT Commissioner M. Perez, Gonzakis and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Robinson et al
as 3:2019cv02591
Defendant:
T. Robinson, Gonzakis, Y. Yang and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halbert v. Jones et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Rich Wills, Ricky D Forbus, Sandy Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Halbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anjali R. David v. Peter O'Rouke
as 5:2018cv01341
Plaintiff:
Anjali R. David
Defendant:
Peter O'Rouke
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
