Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Cooley v. Menzies Aviation (USA) Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
Frederick Marc Cooley
Defendant:
Menzies Aviation (USA) Inc., Amer SM Asif, William Revis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Demby v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Troy Cortez Demby
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, Breitenbach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gabrielle Aguirre et al v. Capital One Bank USA N.A. et al
as 8:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLE AGUIRRE, REYNA ALEMAN DE RAMIREZ, JENNIFER ALMEYDA and others
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A., Does 1 through 100 Inclusive and Capital One Bank USA N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
(PC) Revis v. Moore et al
as 1:2022cv01189
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Revis
Defendant:
J. Moore, David Alvarez, R. Guembe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belton Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05022
Plaintiff:
Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe, Greg Moore and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Andre Revis v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 21-71301
Petitioner:
ANDRE L. REVIS
Respondent:
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden
Andre Lamar Revis v. Ralph Diaz
as 2:2021cv06643
Petitioner:
Andre Lamar Revis
Respondent:
Ralph Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andre Revis v. Stuart Sherman, et al
as 20-16090
Defendant / Appellee:
STUART SHERMAN, Warden, M. HACKER, Associate Warden and J. COLLINS, Associate Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE L. REVIS
Revis v. Kelly
as 6:2019cv01490
Petitioner:
Damon Cyril Revis
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andre L. Revis v. Stuart Sherman et al
as 2:2019cv06626
Defendant:
T. Jones, S. Kane, K. J. Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Revis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
