Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Rah-Nita Boykin et al v. LoanDepot, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01119
Plaintiff:
Rah-Nita Boykin and Jessica Smith
Defendant:
LoanDepot Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Saboor v. United States District Court of Arizona
as 2:2019cv04626
Petitioner:
Abdul Saboor and Rah El Ra Bey
Respondent:
United States District Court of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Eastman Kodak Co.
as 3:2019cv00982
Defendant:
Eastman Kodak Co.
Plaintiff:
RAH Color Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Dalim Software GmbH
as 3:2019cv00518
Defendant:
Dalim Software GmbH
Plaintiff:
RAH Color Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
as 3:2019cv00517
Defendant:
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
Plaintiff:
RAH Color Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Xerox Corporation
as 3:2018cv07464
Plaintiff:
RAH Color Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Xerox Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Electronics For Imaging, Inc. v. RAH Color Technologies LLC
as 3:2018cv07465
Defendant:
RAH Color Technologies LLC
Plaintiff:
Electronics For Imaging Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
RAH Color Technologies LLC et al v. Adobe Inc. et al
as 3:2018md02874
Defendant:
Adobe Inc., Xerox Corporation, Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG and others
Plaintiff:
RAH Color Technologies LLC and Electronics For Imaging Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc
as 3:2018cv03277
Plaintiff:
RAH Color Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Adobe Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Electronics For Imaging, Inc. v. RAH Color Technologies LLC
as 5:2018cv01612
Plaintiff:
Electronics For Imaging, Inc.
Defendant:
RAH Color Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.