Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Loeffler v. Ravalli County et al
as 9:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Dan Robert Loeffler
Defendant:
Ravalli County, Jarin Gassett, Keenan Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flannery v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Flannery
Defendant:
Graham V. Smith, Stephen G. Newberry, Patricia B. Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
USA v. Kimberly Guadalupe, et al
as 22-35394
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
KIMBERLY GUADALUPE
Defendant:
MICHAEL SCOTT MORGAN, Jr.
USA v. Michael Morgan, Jr.
as 19-30251
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT MORGAN, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Morgan et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2018cv01433
Plaintiff:
Scott Morgan and Mason Norgard
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Travis Morgan v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 12-55748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN SCOTT MORGAN and TRAVIS MORGAN, successor-in-interest
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LEROY D. BACA, individual and in his official capacity and others
Adrian Morgan v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 12-55748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN SCOTT MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, LEROY BACA, individual and in his official capacity and others
Adrian Scott Morgan v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2011cv06227
Defendant:
Leroy Baca, Leroy Baca, Dr Chu-Hsian Chi and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Scott Morgan
-AGR Adrian Scott Morgan v. J. Johnston
as 2:2008cv08357
Defendant:
Sheriff Lee Baca, Sheriff Lee Baca, Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Scott Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Hudson, et al
as 2:2010cv01746
Plaintiff:
Adrian Scott Morgan
Defendant:
G.R. Hudson, J. Peacock, S. Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
