Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Lettieri v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al.
as 24-3088
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARMINE LETTIERI
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC., SUSAN JOHNSON, PAUL E. BUNANNO and others
Johnson et al v. GIGSMART, INC.
as 3:2024cv02521
Plaintiff:
Susan Johnson and Christi McCracken
Defendant:
GIGSMART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson et al v. GigSmart, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02233
Plaintiff:
Susan Johnson and Christi McCracken
Defendant:
GigSmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Lettieri v. T-Mobile et al
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
David Carmine Lettieri
Defendant:
T-Mobile, Susan Johnson, Paul E Bunanno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Susan Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
William Greenier et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05000
Plaintiff:
William Greenier, Sherry Grice, Floyd Grier and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Susan Johnson v. Blue Nile, Inc., et al
as 21-16378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
BLUE NILE, INC. and FULLSTORY, INC.
Johnson v. Blue Nile, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv08183
Defendant:
FullStory, Inc. and Blue Nile, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Susan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emmanuel Roy v. Pioneer Human Resources, Inc., et al
as 20-36079
Defendant / Appellee:
SPOKANE RESIDENTIAL REENTRY CENTER, DAN SIEGLER, CARLOS SOLOZAR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL ROY
Roy v. Pioneer Human Resources Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00235
Defendant:
Susan Johnson-Conners, Carlos Solozar, Spokane Residential Reentry Center and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
